IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05617-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative corpus-based news values analysis of Philippine, South Korean, Singapore and Chinese media reactions to Japan’s nuclear wastewater release

Author

Listed:
  • Renping Liu

    (Zhejiang Yuexiu University)

  • Xiaoping Yang

    (Zhejiang Yuexiu University)

  • Cheng Chen

    (Zhejiang Gongshang University)

Abstract

This study aims to explore the different social responses of Japan’s neighboring stakeholder countries, including the Philippines, South Korea, Singapore, and China, toward its nuclear wastewater discharge. Moreover, this study aims to reveal the geopolitical powers that dominate the positions and attitudes of these countries by systematically comparing the news reporting methods in their mainstream media. Adopting a corpus linguistic technique and a discursive news value analysis approach, this study examines news values through sentiment scoring, keywords, nomination strategies, and news photographs in news coverage. The results show that China was the only country that took an explicitly and strongly antagonistic position against Japan’s nuclear wastewater discharge, whereas the other three neighboring stakeholder countries displayed neutral or even supportive positions. China’s opposing position was dominated by the diplomatic concept of building a maritime community with a shared future, while the neutral and supportive positions of the Philippines, South Korea, and Singapore embodied the politics of U.S. allies. This study helps readers understand Japan’s nuclear wastewater release event from a global and sociological perspective; specifically, this issue was not just a marine environmental concern or a bilateral dispute involving Japan but was also shaped by broader geopolitical dynamics, encompassing the diplomatic strategies, domestic politics, and economic interests of various countries and powers. The corpus-based news value analysis approach utilized in this study provides a new and effective methodology for scholars who are interested in analyzing international marine disputes and cross-cultural marine policies from a sociological and data-based perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Renping Liu & Xiaoping Yang & Cheng Chen, 2025. "A comparative corpus-based news values analysis of Philippine, South Korean, Singapore and Chinese media reactions to Japan’s nuclear wastewater release," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05617-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05617-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05617-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05617-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Germond, Basil, 2015. "The geopolitical dimension of maritime security," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 137-142.
    2. Nathan Peng & Sock-Yong Phang, 2018. "Singapore’s economic development: pro- or anti-Washington Consensus?," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 30-52, January.
    3. Putnam, Robert D., 1988. "Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 427-460, July.
    4. Cheng Chen & Renping Liu, 2023. "Confucius in The Times from 1785 to 2019: a diachronic news discourse analysis of newsworthiness," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ethan B Kapstein, 2006. "Architects of stability? International cooperation among financial supervisors," BIS Working Papers 199, Bank for International Settlements.
    2. Simon Hug & Tobias Schulz, 2007. "Referendums in the EU’s constitution building process," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 177-218, June.
    3. Heike Schroeder, 2010. "Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 317-332, December.
    4. Koichi Hamada & Asahi Noguchi, 2005. "The Role of Preconceived Ideas in Macroeconomic Policy: Japan's Experiences in the Two Deflationary Periods," Working Papers 908, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    5. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    6. Annie Young Song, 2023. "Beyond intergovernmental cooperation: domestic politics of transboundary air pollution in Korea and Singapore," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 397-413, December.
    7. Gonzalo Escribano, 2006. "Europeanisation without Europe? The Mediterranean and the Neighbourhood Policy," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 19, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    8. Gerald Schneider & Daniel Finke & Stefanie Bailer, 2010. "Bargaining Power in the European Union: An Evaluation of Competing Game‐Theoretic Models," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 85-103, February.
    9. Jeffry Frieden & Stefanie Walter, 2019. "Analyzing inter-state negotiations in the Eurozone crisis and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 134-151, March.
    10. Helpman, E., 1995. "Politics and Trade Policy," Papers 30-95, Tel Aviv - the Sackler Institute of Economic Studies.
    11. Kathryn M.E. Dominguez, 1993. "The Role of International Organizations in the Bretton Woods System," NBER Chapters, in: A Retrospective on the Bretton Woods System: Lessons for International Monetary Reform, pages 357-404, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Jasper Krommendijk, 2015. "The domestic effectiveness of international human rights monitoring in established democracies. The case of the UN human rights treaty bodies," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 489-512, December.
    13. Conconi, Paola & Sahuguet, Nicolas & Zanardi, Maurizio, 2018. "Electoral incentives, term limits, and the sustainability of peace," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 15-26.
    14. Lindsey Doyle & Lukas Hegele, 2021. "Talks before the talks: Effects of pre-negotiation on reaching peace agreements in intrastate armed conflicts, 2005–15," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(2), pages 231-247, March.
    15. Fritz W. Scharpf, 1991. "Games Real Actors Could Play: The Challenge of Complexity," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 277-304, July.
    16. Jeroen Warner & Neda Zawahri, 2012. "Hegemony and asymmetry: multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 215-229, September.
    17. Mariateresa Fiocca, 2001. "Mediterraneo e Balcani: Due Aree di Crisi e di Opportunità alla periferia dell'unione Europea," ISAE Working Papers 19, ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY).
    18. Yuxuan Lei, 2025. "The Role of Political Actors’ Preference Variation in the Decision-Making Process of the European Union," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, March.
    19. David Carment & Patrick James, 1995. "Internal Constraints and Interstate Ethnic Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(1), pages 82-109, March.
    20. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:557-578 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Robert Pahre, 1998. "Reactions and Reciprocity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(4), pages 467-492, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05617-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.