Author
Abstract
This study synthesizes scholarly perspectives on China’s cultural translation strategies through qualitative meta-synthesis of 650 research articles from leading Chinese academic journals (2001–2020). Using Lasswell’s communication model, the study analyses five dimensions: stakeholders, content selection, dissemination channels, audiences, and impact assessment. Findings reveal that successful cultural translation balances competing priorities rather than following binary oppositions. Research attention is distributed unevenly across dimensions—stakeholder dynamics and content selection receive substantial focus while impact assessment remains significantly underexplored. Analysis shows scholarly preference for collaborative translation approaches combining Chinese cultural knowledge with target language fluency. Content selection analysis identifies tension between traditional and contemporary works, with classical literature dominating academic discourse despite evidence suggesting modern works better engage international audiences. The paper proposes three frameworks emerging from the synthesis: the Integrated Expert Network Model formalizing multi-stakeholder collaboration; the Audience Integration Framework incorporating systematic feedback mechanisms; and the Tiered Support Model balancing cultural significance with market potential. This research contributes to translation studies by systematically mapping scholarly discourse, identifying effective practices, and proposing structured approaches that can inform translation policy beyond the Chinese context.
Suggested Citation
Sanjun Sun & Lijie Zhao & Xiaoyan Zhou, 2025.
"Beyond binary oppositions: a meta-synthesis of China’s cultural translation strategies for global communication,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05572-7
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05572-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05572-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.