Author
Abstract
The study of objects holds a central place in research on interdisciplinary research practices, yet we know little about the role of objects in facilitating or hindering interdisciplinary learning in higher education. This article develops a pluralist, relational, and dynamic approach to studying the role of objects in interdisciplinary teaching and learning. We document the potential for objects to perform different functions depending on how they are employed and engaged in educational settings. Based on a small, exploratory case study of teaching-learning dynamics at an interdisciplinary MSc course, we examine the roles performed by three very different objects: the dominant object of mixed methods, an interdisciplinary mapping exercise introduced by the teacher, and the spontaneously emerging epistemic object of “perceptions”. We find clear limitations of the dominant mixed-methods approach to interdisciplinarity: while the approach provides a simple and efficient way to organize interdisciplinary collaboration, it risks reinforcing disciplinary boundaries rather than enabling their crossing. Although this gives students the impression of doing interdisciplinary work—and enables them to do so at a relatively superficial level—it simultaneously undercuts the potential for deeper learning. In contrast, we found the “epistemic” object of “perceptions”, that surfaced spontaneously in a student discussion, provided opportunities for transformative understanding across disciplines. We conclude the paper with some reflections on the learning potential of troublesome differences and our role as teachers in balancing improvisation and scaffolding to stimulate deeper interdisciplinary learning beyond mixed methods. In our discussion, we draw upon the concept of threshold concepts to better understand how objects can variously serve as bridges for communication or as portals to more profound interdisciplinary understanding, suggesting new directions for research on objects in teaching and learning contexts.
Suggested Citation
Rune Bolding Bennike & Katrine Ellemose Lindvig, 2025.
"Beyond mixed methods: a pluralist approach to objects in interdisciplinary teaching and learning,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05418-2
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05418-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05418-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.