IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05387-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Nature Index journals a valid basis for academic assessment: a study of academic impact and disruptive innovation assessment based on open bibliographic metadata and citation data

Author

Listed:
  • Yuyan Jiang

    (State Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Jianxia Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Journal listings play an important role in current journal evaluation, publication reference, research assessment and position promotion. Considering the current orientation of science and technology development and the need of transformative changes in academic evaluation, this study aims to examine Nature Index journals list. The focus will be on exploring the coverage of research topics, assessing the innovation levels of the published papers, and identifying underrepresented research areas. The outcome will facilitate the identification of high-level science and technology journals that can serve as valuable references for the Nature Index team and relevant management and research institutions in their scientific research evaluation processes. The results of the study show that of the 3029 research topics in the science fields defined by OpenAlex, 2217 (73.19%) are covered by Nature Index journals. Across all 18 research disciplines outside of Dentistry and Veterinary, Nature Index journals show a clear advantage in academic quality (the average share of dominant research topics in each disciplinary category is around 90%). However, Nature Index journals have an advantage in terms of academic impact over the level of disruptive innovation. In this study, two journals have been also selected to supplement the latest Nature Index list by taking the disruptive innovation level as the core index and the academic influence and long-term development of the journals in the related research fields as the reference. Generally speaking, the list of Nature Index journals is relatively complete, but there is still room for adjustment. Nature Index journals have a high academic impact and disruptive innovation level in most of the research topics that they cover, but they are more focused on academic impact. Appropriately adding representative journals in uncharted research areas will enhance the application value of the Nature Index in academic evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuyan Jiang & Jianxia Ma, 2025. "Are Nature Index journals a valid basis for academic assessment: a study of academic impact and disruptive innovation assessment based on open bibliographic metadata and citation data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05387-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05387-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05387-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05387-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05387-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.