Author
Abstract
Urban streets are primary settings for criminal activities. Although prior studies have examined various environmental factors influencing criminal behavior, insufficient attention has been paid to street configurational types within street network morphology. To address this gap, this study employs kernel density estimation and spatial autocorrelation to analyze the spatial distribution patterns of assault, robbery, larceny, and motor vehicle theft in Detroit in 2019. Based on these spatial patterns, a comprehensive street environmental indicator system was constructed, incorporating three dimensions: street network morphology, nodal characteristics, and socioeconomic attributes. Negative binomial regression models were subsequently employed to analyze the effects of these factors on the spatial distribution of the four crime types. The findings reveal significant spatial clustering of all four types of crimes in Detroit. Neighborhoods with a higher proportion of community roads, increased street permeability for pedestrians, a higher density of dining establishments, and elevated rental rates were more likely to experience criminal activities. Conversely, neighborhoods with a greater number of intersections exhibited lower crime frequencies. Areas with a higher percentage of residents holding bachelor’s degrees or above were more prone to property crimes. In terms of street network morphology, the proportion of ring roads (cell-ratio) had a positive impact on assault, robbery, and larceny. This study contributes to the literature by expanding the indicator system for analyzing the relationship between street environments and crimes, enriching existing crime pattern theories, and providing new perspectives and practical guidance for street design aimed at crime prevention.
Suggested Citation
Yuanyuan Mao & Shuqi Huang & Yueqiao Ning & Can Wang & Wenchao Li & Ziheng Huang & Shanhe Jiang & Yanqing Xu, 2025.
"Unraveling the Nexus: how street network morphology influences crime in Detroit,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05362-1
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05362-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05362-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.