IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05304-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The global prevalence and associated factors of loneliness in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nader Salari

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences)

  • Hadi Najafi

    (Department of Geriatric Health, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences)

  • Shabnam Rasoulpoor

    (Department of Nursing, Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Nursing)

  • Zara Canbary

    (Faculty of Business Management, Emirates Aviation University)

  • Pegah Heidarian

    (Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences)

  • Masoud Mohammadi

    (Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences)

Abstract

Loneliness in older adults is a major health concern in today’s world. As a phenomenon that can significantly impact the well-being and quality of individuals’ lives, the issue has received limited attention to date. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarize the findings on the prevalence of loneliness and its related factors. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search covering Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was conducted from inception to March 2025. I2 statistic was employed to assess the presence of statistical heterogeneity among the studies using a random-effects model. A total of 126 studies comprising 1,250,322 older adults were included in this review. The meta-analysis found that the prevalence of loneliness among this population was 27.6%. The highest prevalence of loneliness among older adults is observed in North America, with a prevalence rate of 30.5% (95% CI: 24.7–37); older women (30.9%) and institutionalized older adults (50.7%) had the highest prevalence of loneliness. The review of 189 papers revealed important factors that were related to loneliness. In general, the findings of this research showed that almost one out of every four older people in the world feels lonely, which highlights a considerable statistic. In light of the association of loneliness with various health, clinical, and social factors, including depression, suicidal ideation, and mortality, and the anticipated rise in the older population, mental health practitioners and policymakers must develop and implement interventions aimed at alleviating loneliness among older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Nader Salari & Hadi Najafi & Shabnam Rasoulpoor & Zara Canbary & Pegah Heidarian & Masoud Mohammadi, 2025. "The global prevalence and associated factors of loneliness in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05304-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05304-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05304-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05304-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05304-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.