IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05278-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the national security risk assessment model: a case study of political security in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zonghuang Xu

    (Nanjing University
    Nanyang Technological University)

  • Jin Shi

    (Nanjing University)

Abstract

National security risk assessment is an indispensable key component of the national security system, serving as a foundation for national security decision-making, crisis prevention, and protection of national interests. While national security encompasses a broad spectrum of risks, including political, military, economic, technological, and social dimensions, this study focuses specifically on political security risk assessment as a case study within the broader framework of national security. Currently, there is no consensus on standardized requirements, processes, and methods for assessing national security risks. This study aims to develop a comprehensive national security risk assessment model, and the assessment path is explored from three dimensions: risk control processes, relationships among assessment factors, and the assessment model itself. To validate the model’s feasibility, we conduct an empirical study focusing specifically on China’s political security as one critical domain within the broader national security landscape. Using a game theory combination weighting method, risk indicator weights were determined, and political security risk assessment was calculated through the simulated annealing optimized projection pursuit evaluation method. The results indicate that China’s political security risk has generally declined, dropping from 76.39 in 2001 to 24.99 in 2022, with projections suggesting a continued decline to 11.00 by 2032. Among the five predictive models compared, the BP neural network model achieved the highest determination coefficient (R2 = 0.9967), demonstrating superior predictive performance. The proposed model provides a methodological framework that can be applied not only to political security but also adapted to other domains of national security, offering theoretical guidance and methodological support for comprehensive national security risk evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zonghuang Xu & Jin Shi, 2025. "Research on the national security risk assessment model: a case study of political security in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05278-w
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05278-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05278-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05278-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05278-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.