IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05273-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How prevalent is the cross-disciplinary career transition? Evidence from a multi-dimensional comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tongyang Zhang

    (Sun Yat-sen University
    Chengdu University)

  • Chao Yu

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

  • Dong Zhang

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

  • Jian Xu

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

Abstract

In today’s pluralistic society, cross-disciplinary career transitions are critical for adapting to ever-changing job demands. Important influencing factors have been identified to explain these transition actions. However, studies on the prevalence of career transitions in different disciplinary areas are rare, especially those investigating the patterns of disciplinary changes accompanied by career transitions. This study applies text mining techniques, presenting data to demonstrate and compare how career transition exists widely across various disciplines. Taking library science, linguistics, electronic engineering, and radiology as representative areas and extracting resume data from Indeed, the empirical study yields noteworthy findings: Overall, the prevalence of career transition exists, with patterns varying across disciplines, illuminating the necessity for developing more inclusive curriculums or career planning frameworks to accommodate diverse needs of the job market. From the dimension of major discipline, the permeation pattern of disciplines varies. Humanities and natural sciences typically extend to other target domains, social sciences exhibit significant permeability, while engineering sciences generally revert to the initial domain. From the sub-discipline dimension, disciplines closer to the initial discipline do not necessarily have a higher employment rate. Rankings of disciplinary interaction strength and employment probabilities have a notable rank-turbulence divergence spanning from 0.4 to 0.7; from the occupation dimension, occupations spanning across different disciplines are abundant in the job market; from the skill dimension, the representativeness of occupational skills varies both within and outside the initial disciplines. Discipline-specific skills in electronic engineering and linguistics exhibit high representativeness both within and outside the initial discipline, while soft skills rank high outside the initial discipline in library science and radiology. These findings indicate how individuals develop professionally throughout transitions between various disciplines, providing strategic guidance for policymakers to synchronize career transition policies with specific patterns of discipline change, thereby promoting interdisciplinary talent cultivation objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Tongyang Zhang & Chao Yu & Dong Zhang & Jian Xu, 2025. "How prevalent is the cross-disciplinary career transition? Evidence from a multi-dimensional comparative analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05273-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05273-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05273-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05273-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05273-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.