IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05273-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How prevalent is the cross-disciplinary career transition? Evidence from a multi-dimensional comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tongyang Zhang

    (Sun Yat-sen University
    Chengdu University)

  • Chao Yu

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

  • Dong Zhang

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

  • Jian Xu

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

Abstract

In today’s pluralistic society, cross-disciplinary career transitions are critical for adapting to ever-changing job demands. Important influencing factors have been identified to explain these transition actions. However, studies on the prevalence of career transitions in different disciplinary areas are rare, especially those investigating the patterns of disciplinary changes accompanied by career transitions. This study applies text mining techniques, presenting data to demonstrate and compare how career transition exists widely across various disciplines. Taking library science, linguistics, electronic engineering, and radiology as representative areas and extracting resume data from Indeed, the empirical study yields noteworthy findings: Overall, the prevalence of career transition exists, with patterns varying across disciplines, illuminating the necessity for developing more inclusive curriculums or career planning frameworks to accommodate diverse needs of the job market. From the dimension of major discipline, the permeation pattern of disciplines varies. Humanities and natural sciences typically extend to other target domains, social sciences exhibit significant permeability, while engineering sciences generally revert to the initial domain. From the sub-discipline dimension, disciplines closer to the initial discipline do not necessarily have a higher employment rate. Rankings of disciplinary interaction strength and employment probabilities have a notable rank-turbulence divergence spanning from 0.4 to 0.7; from the occupation dimension, occupations spanning across different disciplines are abundant in the job market; from the skill dimension, the representativeness of occupational skills varies both within and outside the initial disciplines. Discipline-specific skills in electronic engineering and linguistics exhibit high representativeness both within and outside the initial discipline, while soft skills rank high outside the initial discipline in library science and radiology. These findings indicate how individuals develop professionally throughout transitions between various disciplines, providing strategic guidance for policymakers to synchronize career transition policies with specific patterns of discipline change, thereby promoting interdisciplinary talent cultivation objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Tongyang Zhang & Chao Yu & Dong Zhang & Jian Xu, 2025. "How prevalent is the cross-disciplinary career transition? Evidence from a multi-dimensional comparative analysis," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05273-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05273-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05273-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05273-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petrongolo, Barbara & Ronchi, Maddalena, 2020. "Gender gaps and the structure of local labor markets," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Mahmoudi, Samir Elsadek, 2023. "Late-career unemployment shocks, pension outcomes and unemployment insurance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Wrenn, Douglas H. & Kelsey, Timothy W. & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2015. "Resident vs. Nonresident Employment Associated with Marcellus Shale Development," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 44(2), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Yujia Zhai & Ying Ding & Fang Wang, 2018. "Measuring the diffusion of an innovation: A citation analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 69(3), pages 368-379, March.
    5. Jennifer L. Doleac & Benjamin Hansen, 2020. "The Unintended Consequences of “Ban the Box”: Statistical Discrimination and Employment Outcomes When Criminal Histories Are Hidden," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(2), pages 321-374.
    6. Aomar Ibourk & Karim El Aynaoui, 2023. "Career Trajectories of Higher Education Graduates: Impact of Soft Skills," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Roberto Sala, 2013. "One, Two, or Three Cultures? Humanities Versus the Natural and Social Sciences in Modern Germany," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(1), pages 83-97, March.
    8. Cristina López de Subijana & Larisa Galatti & Rubén Moreno & Jose L. Chamorro, 2020. "Analysis of the Athletic Career and Retirement Depending on the Type of Sport: A Comparison between Individual and Team Sports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Uma Jogulu & Esmé Franken, 2023. "The career resilience of senior women managers: A cross‐cultural perspective," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 280-300, January.
    10. Kandel, William & Newman, Constance, 2004. "Rural Hispanics: Employment and Residential Trends," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-8, June.
    11. Sudipto Banerjee & David Blau, 2016. "Employment Trends by Age in the United States: Why Are Older Workers Different?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 51(1), pages 163-199.
    12. Katharine G. Abraham & Melissa S. Kearney, 2020. "Explaining the Decline in the US Employment-to-Population Ratio: A Review of the Evidence," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(3), pages 585-643, September.
    13. Caroline Paunov & Sandra Planes-Satorra & Tadanori Moriguchi, 2017. "What role for social sciences in innovation?: Re-assessing how scientific disciplines contribute to different industries," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 45, OECD Publishing.
    14. Lu Huang & Yijie Cai & Erdong Zhao & Shengting Zhang & Yue Shu & Jiao Fan, 2022. "Measuring the interdisciplinarity of Information and Library Science interactions using citation analysis and semantic analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6733-6761, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Bayer & Kerwin Kofi Charles & Ellora Derenoncourt, 2025. "Racial Inequality in the Labor Market," Working Papers 343, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    2. Dejing Kong & Jianzhong Yang & Lingfeng Li, 2020. "Early identification of technological convergence in numerical control machine tool: a deep learning approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1983-2009, December.
    3. Burnett, J. Wesley, 2015. "FOREWORD: Unconventional Oil and Gas Development: Economic, Environmental, and Policy Analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 44(2), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Hoy, Kyle A. & Wrenn, Douglas H., 2018. "Unconventional energy, taxation, and interstate welfare: An analysis of Pennsylvania's severance tax policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 53-65.
    5. Michaela Fuchs & Anja Rossen & Antje Weyh & Gabriele Wydra‐Somaggio, 2021. "Where do women earn more than men? Explaining regional differences in the gender pay gap," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1065-1086, November.
    6. Younjun Kim & Eric Thompson, 2021. "Routine-Biased Technological Change and Declining Employment Rate of Immigrants," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 319-353, June.
    7. Holzer, Harry J., 2023. "Can Workforce Development Help Us Reach Full Employment?," IZA Discussion Papers 16624, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Diane Coyle & Mark Fabian & Eric Beinhocker & Tim Besley & Margaret Stevens, 2023. "Is it time to reboot welfare economics? Overview," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 109-121, June.
    9. Borghorst, Malte & Mulalic, Ismir & van Ommeren, Jos, 2024. "Commuting, gender and children," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. repec:osf:socarx:sh58c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Karen A. Kopecky & Jeremy Greenwood & Nezih Guner, 2022. "Substance Abuse during the Pandemic: Implications for Labor-Force Participation," Working Papers 1335, Barcelona School of Economics.
    12. David Card & Fabrizio Colella & Rafael Lalive, 2025. "Gender Preferences in Job Vacancies and Workplace Gender Diversity," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 92(4), pages 2437-2471.
    13. Randi Hjalmarsson & Stephen Machin & Paolo Pinotti, 2024. "Crime and the labor market," CEP Discussion Papers dp2044, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Alison Andrew & Sarah Cattan & Monica Costa Dias & Christine Farquharson & Lucy Kraftman & Sonya Krutikova & Angus Phimister & Almudena Sevilla, 2022. "The gendered division of paid and domestic work under lockdown," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 325-340, December.
    15. Holzer, Harry J., 2019. "The US Labor Market in 2050: Supply, Demand and Policies to Improve Outcomes," IZA Policy Papers 148, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Bram Timmermans & Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde, 2023. "(Gender) Tone at the top: the effects of gender board diversity on gender wage inequality in Europe," GRAPE Working Papers 89, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    17. Richard Blundell & Hugo Lopez & James P. Ziliak, 2025. "Labor Market Inequality and the Changing Life Cycle Profile of Male and Female Wages," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 100-133, October.
    18. Pinghui Wu, 2022. "Wage Inequality and the Rise in Labor Force Exit: The Case of US Prime-Age Men," Working Papers 22-16, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    19. Guettabi, Mouhcine & James, Alexander, 2020. "Who benefits from an oil boom? Evidence from a unique Alaskan data set," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    20. Richard Blundell & Christopher R. Bollinger & Charles Hokayem & James P. Ziliak, 2025. "Interpreting Cohort Profiles of Life Cycle Earnings Volatility," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(S1), pages 55-82.
    21. Grigoli, Francesco & Koczan, Zsoka & Topalova, Petia, 2020. "Automation and labor force participation in advanced economies: Macro and micro evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05273-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.