Author
Listed:
- Tingsong Li
(Dongchuan Road 800)
- Xi Yang
(Dongchuan Road 800)
- Jia Cai
(Dongchuan Road 800)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly changed faculty members’ lifestyles and work patterns with persisting effects in the post-pandemic era that potentially affect their scientific research. Through a systematic review of 52 articles related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on faculty members’ research performance, this study finds that most of the literature suggests that the pandemic has had a positive impact on academic publications related to COVID-19, but a negative impact on non-COVID-19-related articles. In addition, the negative impact of the pandemic on female faculty members’ scientific research performance is more significant than that of their male counterparts. This study further explores how the COVID-19 pandemic may have affected the academic performance of faculty members. Three internal mechanisms are explored. Firstly, due to the pandemic, faculty members were compelled to adopt a work from home (WFH) model, which has changed their work schedules, led to heightened psychological stress, and required them to adapt to new technologies. Secondly, the pandemic has altered research collaboration patterns. In COVID-19-related fields, the number of research collaborations has gradually increased, with more diverse collaboration teams, though the team size has reduced. Conversely, non-COVID-19-related fields have witnessed a decrease in the overall number of collaborative studies. Thirdly, there have been some adjustments in the allocation of research resources across universities, potentially affecting funding availability for faculty members across various disciplines. Finally, this paper presents future research implications and policy recommendations to support the management and revitalization of university research in the post-pandemic era.
Suggested Citation
Tingsong Li & Xi Yang & Jia Cai, 2025.
"A systematic literature review on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on faculty members’ research performance,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05257-1
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05257-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05257-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.