IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05248-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conversational implicature: a diachronic cognitive pragmatic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ruili Su

    (Shandong University)

  • Yanfei Zhang

    (Shandong University)

Abstract

This study conducts a corpus-based diachronic investigation of the noun phrase hóngyǎn (红眼) and proposes the diachronic cognitive pragmatic model to demonstrate that particularized conversational implicatures develop into generalized conversational implicatures and eventually become new coded meanings. The results show that (1) different types of meanings such as generalized conversational implicatures and particularized conversational implicatures are closely correlated with each other; (2) the diachronic change from particularized conversational implicatures to new coded meanings through generalized conversational implicatures is an entrenchment-conventionalization process; (3) conventions and contexts coexist with each other, and meaning change is from highly contextualized to highly conventionalized. This study reveals that pragmatic meanings can become entrenched and conventionalized to be new coded meanings through repeated usage and suggests that the diachronic corpus method contributes to uncovering the connection between different types of meanings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruili Su & Yanfei Zhang, 2025. "Conversational implicature: a diachronic cognitive pragmatic approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05248-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05248-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05248-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05248-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05248-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.