Author
Listed:
- Peng Wang
(Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry)
- Le Li
(Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry)
- Zhiqiang Gao
(Xichang University)
- Nan Li
(International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan)
- Dongyang Han
(Research Institute of Forestry Policy and Information, Chinese Academy of Forestry)
Abstract
The scientific evaluation of the ecosystem service value (ESV) of national parks and understanding the trade-offs and synergies between different ecosystem services (ESs) are crucial for advancing the establishment of China’s national park system. However, current research on ESs in national parks is mostly focused on the value assessment of certain types of services. The analysis of their impacts under specific socioeconomic conditions remains very limited, and research on the trade-offs and synergies between different ESs is scant. This study focuses on China’s Qianjiangyuan National Park (QNP) pilot area. To evaluate its ESV at both the temporal and spatial scales, models and tools including value equivalent factors, partial least squares regression, sensitivity analysis, spatial autocorrelation, and trade-off/synergy assessment are utilized. Moreover, the influencing factors of ESV evolution under specific socioeconomic conditions are analyzed, and the trade-off/synergy relationships between ESVs are identified. The results indicate the following. (1) The total ESVs in 1990, 2000, 2010, 2015, and 2020 were respectively CNY 170.63 × 107, 169.65 × 107, 171.89 × 107, 171.95 × 107, and 172.11 × 107. Forest land was the main contributor to ESV, and the type of ES with the highest contribution rate was regulating services. (2) Positive spatial autocorrelations were found for ESVs in the national park pilot area, indicating a clustered distribution pattern. High-value clusters were identified in Suzhuang Town and Qixi Town. (3) The added value of secondary industries, the added value of primary industries, and the added value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery were found to be the most important factors affecting ESV changes in the pilot area. The tea yield had no effect on the evolution of ESV. (4) In the pilot area, synergies between ESs were more stable than trade-offs, with synergies accounting for 66.67%. Trade-offs primarily existed between food production services and other services. Compared with previous investigations, this research represents a long-term, multi-scale, and comprehensive dynamic study on the only national park system pilot area in eastern China. Moreover, it presents a set of socioeconomic evaluation indicators suitable for creating national parks in economically developed, densely populated areas with complex land ownership complex. The research results enhance the comparability, generalizability, and replicability of national park ESV evaluation methods and outcomes, and provide a valuable reference for conducting ES research in other types of nature reserves.
Suggested Citation
Peng Wang & Le Li & Zhiqiang Gao & Nan Li & Dongyang Han, 2025.
"Spatiotemporal differentiation and trade-off/synergy relationships of ecosystem service values in a national park pilot area in China,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05236-6
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05236-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05236-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.