IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05168-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age differences in preference and memory for advertisements: the roles of advertisement type and product type

Author

Listed:
  • Wanying Chen

    (Zhejiang Normal University
    Zhejiang Normal University)

  • Lei Zhang

    (Zhejiang Normal University
    Zhejiang Normal University)

  • Siyu Yang

    (Zhejiang Normal University
    Zhejiang Normal University)

  • Zixu Shen

    (Zhejiang Normal University
    Zhejiang Normal University)

  • Fang Xie

    (Zhejiang Normal University
    Zhejiang Normal University)

  • Valerie Benson

    (University of Central Lancashire)

Abstract

Previous research has examined how motivational goals influence decision-making in advertising for both older and younger adults, and the findings support the proposal of socioemotional selective theory (SST), which suggests that older adults pursue emotionally-meaningful goals. However, such studies are limited in providing cross-cultural evidence, and the relevance of health-related goals in the contribution to age differences in preference and memory is underexplored. This study aimed to fill those research gaps, and investigated preference and memory, in Chinese younger and older adults, for emotionally-meaning and knowledge-related advertisements, for functional and general food products. Young adults (115 aged 18–26) and older adults (113 aged 60–86) were asked to indicate their purchase intentions for products, their liking of advertisements, and their recall of the advertisements they had viewed. For general food products, older adults showed more intention to purchase, and also better recall for emotionally-meaningful advertisements compared with young adults. However, both old and young adults showed an increased preference and memory for knowledge-related advertisements for functional food products, and this effect was greater for the older adults. The findings indicate that any default in older adults to focus on emotionally meaning information can be overridden when product information is directly related to individual health benefits. Thus, the SST may only apply when there is no personal investment in the decision to be made and hence these findings challenge the influential SST in its traditional form.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanying Chen & Lei Zhang & Siyu Yang & Zixu Shen & Fang Xie & Valerie Benson, 2025. "Age differences in preference and memory for advertisements: the roles of advertisement type and product type," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05168-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05168-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05168-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05168-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McKay-Nesbitt, Jane & Manchanda, Rajesh V. & Smith, Malcolm C. & Huhmann, Bruce A., 2011. "Effects of age, need for cognition, and affective intensity on advertising effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 12-17, January.
    2. Aimee Drolet & Patti Williams & Loraine Lau-Gesk, 2007. "Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 211-221, December.
    3. Sarah D. Asebedo & Martin C. Seay & Kristy Archuleta & Gary Brase, 2019. "The Psychological Predictors of Older Preretirees’ Financial Self-Efficacy," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 127-138, April.
    4. John, Deborah Roedder & Cole, Catherine A, 1986. "Age Differences in Information Processing: Understanding Deficits in Young and Elderly Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(3), pages 297-315, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pragya Keshari & Sangeeta Jain, 2016. "Effect of Age and Gender on Consumer Response to Advertising Appeals," Paradigm, , vol. 20(1), pages 69-82, June.
    2. Kuppelwieser, Volker G., 2016. "Towards the use of chronological age in research – A cautionary comment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 17-22.
    3. Richard Huaman-Ramirez & Dwight Merunka, 2019. "Brand experience effects on brand attachment: The role of brand trust, age, and income," Post-Print hal-02118504, HAL.
    4. Inés López López & Salvador Ruiz de Maya, 2012. "When hedonic products help regulate my mood," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 701-717, September.
    5. Zsótér, Boglárka & Nagy, Péter, 2012. "Our Everyday Emotions and Finances – The role money-related attitudes and materialistic orienta-tion play in developing financial culture," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 57(3), pages 286-297.
    6. Lynn Gregory, 2014. "Fundraising and the Elderly: A Content Analysis," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 5-25, March.
    7. Rita Ferreira Gomes & Beatriz Casais, 2018. "Feelings generated by threat appeals in social marketing: text and emoji analysis of user reactions to anorexia nervosa campaigns in social media," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(4), pages 591-607, December.
    8. Adriana Dima & Elena Radu & Ecaterina Milica Dobrota & Adrian Otoiu & Alina Florentina Saracu, 2023. "Sustainable Development of E-commerce in the Post-COVID Times: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Pestle Factors," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(S17), pages 1095-1095, November.
    9. Leoni Schilling & Sabrina Hegner & Ardion Beldad & Elif Durmaz & Gerrit Hirschfeld, 2024. "Not Our War: The Effects of Response Strategies and Message Frames From a Russian Association on the Public’s Attitude Toward Russians Living in Germany," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    10. Ana C. Martinez-Levy & Dario Rossi & Giulia Cartocci & Marco Mancini & Gianluca Flumeri & Arianna Trettel & Fabio Babiloni & Patrizia Cherubino, 2022. "Message framing, non-conscious perception and effectiveness in non-profit advertising. Contribution by neuromarketing research," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(1), pages 53-75, March.
    11. Wang, Saerom & Kirillova, Ksenia & Lehto, Xinran, 2017. "Reconciling unsatisfying tourism experiences: Message type effectiveness and the role of counterfactual thinking," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 233-243.
    12. Crawford, Heather J. & Gregory, Gary D., 2015. "Humorous advertising that travels: A review and call for research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 569-577.
    13. Byun, Jaemun & Jang, SooCheong (Shawn), 2015. "Effective destination advertising: Matching effect between advertising language and destination type," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 31-40.
    14. Liu, Feng & Zhao, Shaoqiong & Li, Yang, 2017. "How many, how often, and how new? A multivariate profiling of mobile app users," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 71-80.
    15. Daniel McFadden, 2008. "Human Capital Accumulation and Depreciation," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(3), pages 379-385.
    16. Kim, Kyuha & Lee, Sungmi & Choi, Yung Kyun, 2019. "Image proximity in advertising appeals: Spatial distance and product types," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 490-497.
    17. Šišara, Jelena & Goleš, Divna, 2017. "How Students as Consumers Learn Information about New Products," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2017), Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 7-9 September 2017, pages 199-206, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    18. Carpio, Ronaldo & Guo, Meixin & Liu, Yuan & Pyun, Ju Hyun, 2021. "Wealth heterogeneity, information acquisition and equity home bias: Evidence from U.S. household surveys of consumer finance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Bärbel Knäuper & Kimberly Carrière & Melodie Chamandy & Zhen Xu & Norbert Schwarz & Natalie O. Rosen, 2016. "How aging affects self-reports," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 185-193, June.
    20. Baudier, Patricia & Ammi, Chantal & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2022. "Impact of advertising on users’ perceptions regarding the Internet of things," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 355-366.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05168-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.