Author
Abstract
Undergraduate interpreting training programs rely heavily on high-quality textbooks to develop student interpreters’ interpreting competence. However, there is limited empirical research assessing the vocabulary of interpreting textbooks, leaving a gap in understanding their lexical demands and pedagogical effectiveness. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the English vocabulary of undergraduate interpreting textbooks from the perspectives of vocabulary load, frequency distribution, and repetition patterns. Based on a corpus of two textbooks on interpreting between Chinese and English widely used in undergraduate interpreting training programs in the Chinese Mainland, the study finds that both textbooks require student interpreter users to possess a productive vocabulary of 3000 to 5000 word families (plus words from supplementary lists). Also, both textbooks feature the highest proportion of high-frequency words, provide an opportunity to learn mid-frequency words dominated by the third 1000 word families, and present low-frequency words concerning trending topics associated with social life in both international and domestic contexts during a certain period. Moreover, they lack words repeating at least five times across book units, while words appearing in only one unit account for a high proportion. This vocabulary assessment also provides an approach to differentiate between textbooks in the abovementioned aspects. With no vocabulary list predefined in the syllabus, this corpus-based approach of textbook vocabulary assessment can empower textbook evaluation by providing quantitative evidence for textbook suitability and usability, thereby aiding interpreting textbook writers and teachers in promoting students’ language competence, subject matter knowledge, interpreting ability, and the cultivation of values.
Suggested Citation
Dandan Sheng & Xin Li, 2025.
"A corpus-based assessment of vocabulary in interpreting textbooks,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05152-9
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05152-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05152-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.