IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-02291-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the influence of teachers’ motivating styles on college students’ agentic engagement in online learning: The mediating and suppressing effects of self-regulated learning ability

Author

Listed:
  • Suqi Li

    (Nanjing Normal University)

  • Kexue Xu

    (South China Normal University)

  • Jun Huang

    (Nanjing Normal University Taizhou College)

Abstract

Online learning has gradually become the new mainstream learning norm during the post-epidemic era. To ensure college students’ online learning effectiveness, they need to be proactively engaged in their online learning, which means that they need to maintain a high level of agentic engagement. However, it is not clear what factors influence college students’ agentic engagement in online learning environments. According to self-determination theory (SDT), the teacher, as an important external factor, can influence students’ learning engagement and learning effectiveness. Meanwhile, self-regulated learning (SRL) ability is important for college students in online learning. Based on existing theoretical foundations, therefore, the current study attempts to explore the following research questions: Are there relationships between teachers’ motivating styles (including autonomy-supportive style and controlling style), college students’ online SRL ability, and college students’ online learning agentic engagement? If yes, how does the former influence college students’ online learning agentic engagement? To respond to these research questions, random sampling was used to collect a total of 681 valid data from college students with experience in online learning. Then, a pilot test, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis were first conducted to confirm the reliability and validity of the data. Correlational and mediating analyses were then conducted using SPSS 21.0. According to the results, firstly, teachers’ motivating styles (autonomy-supportive style and controlling style) and college students’ online SRL ability were positively correlated with college students’ online agentic engagement. Secondly, teachers’ autonomy-supportive style was positively correlated with college students’ online SRL ability, but the controlling style was negatively correlated with their online SRL ability. What’s more, college students’ online SRL ability, as a mediating factor, acted as a partial mediation between autonomy-supportive style and college students’ online agentic engagement, and there was a suppressing effect of college students’ SRL ability between teachers’ controlling style and college students’ agentic engagement. The results imply that teachers should choose motivating styles appropriately based on students’ online learning characteristics and content, and college students should develop online SRL ability to improve their agentic engagement and ultimately achieve good online learning effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Suqi Li & Kexue Xu & Jun Huang, 2023. "Exploring the influence of teachers’ motivating styles on college students’ agentic engagement in online learning: The mediating and suppressing effects of self-regulated learning ability," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02291-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02291-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-02291-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-02291-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jae-Hak Lim & Sang Wook Shin & Dae Kyung Kim & Dong Ho Park, 2004. "Bootstrap Confidence Intervals For Steady-State Availability," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 407-419.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ákos Jarjabka & Norbert Sipos & Gabriella Kuráth, 2024. "Quo vadis higher education? Post-pandemic success digital competencies of the higher educators – a Hungarian university case and actions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rohit Patawa & Pramendra Singh Pundir & Alok Kumar Sigh & Abhinav Singh, 2022. "Some inferences on reliability measures of two-non-identical units cold standby system waiting for repair," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 172-188, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02291-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.