Between piece molds and lost wax: the casting of a diatrete ornamentation in early China rethought

For a long time, research on the pre-Han (before 202 BCE) Chinese use of the lost-wax process was targeted at demonstrating that it was of no use at all. That position was severely shaken when the zun-pan set of Zeng Hou Yi (“Marquis Yi of Zeng,” d. 433 BCE) was unearthed at Hubei Suizhou in 1978, along with subsequently excavated finds or rediscovered artifacts carrying similarly interpenetrating openwork. Since the early 2000s, however, there has been a persistent revival of a research orientation against the use of the lost-wax process in Bronze Age China. After surging first in Chinese academia, the new tide took some time to arrive in the West. A response to Donna Strahan’s prestigious lecture, “Debating the Use of Lost-wax Casting in Ancient China,” this article presents my thinking about lost wax versus piece molds in early Chinese casting practices. Strahan’s studied “diatrete” ornamentation in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, to me, can be securely identified as lost-wax cast thanks to some telltale traces. Through this critical investigation, I invite my fellow art historians, archaeologists, and historians of metal technology to emerge from the “doubting of lost wax” era to tackle new challenges in early Chinese archaeo-metallurgy.