IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v55y2004i2d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An intelligent system for prioritisation of organ transplant patient waiting lists using fuzzy logic

Author

Listed:
  • T Perris

    (University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST))

  • A W Labib

    (University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST))

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of using fuzzy logic in a complex decision-making capacity, and in particular, for the prioritisation of kidney transplant recipients. Fuzzy logic is an extension to Boolean logic allowing an element to have degrees of true and false as opposed to being either 100% true or 100% false. Thus, it can account for the ‘shades of grey’ found in many real-world situations. In this paper, two fuzzy logic models are developed demonstrating its effectiveness as a model for vastly improving the current prioritisation system used in the UK and abroad. The first model converts an element of the current kidney transplant prioritisation system used in the UK into fuzzy logic. The result is an improvement to the current system and a demonstration of fuzzy logic as an effective decision-making approach. The second model offers an alternative prioritisation system to overcome the limitations of the current system both in the UK and abroad, as brought up by research reviewed in this paper. The current UK transplant prioritisation system, adapted in the first model, uses objective criteria (age of recipient, waiting time, etc) as inputs into the decision-making process. This alternative model takes advantage of the facility for infinitely varying inputs into fuzzy logic and a system is developed that can handle subjective (humanistic) criteria (pain level, quality of life, etc) that are key to arriving at such important decisions. Furthermore, the model is highly flexible allowing any number of criteria to be used and the individual characteristics of each criterion to be altered. The result is a model that utilises the scope of fuzzy logic's flexibility, usability and effectiveness in the field of decision-making and a transplant prioritisation method vastly superior to the original system, which is constrained by its use of only objective criteria. The ‘humanistic’ model demonstrates the ability of fuzzy logic to consider subjective and complex criteria. However, the criteria used are not intended to be exhaustive. It is simply a template to which medical professionals can apply limitless additional criteria. The model is produced as an alternative to any current national system. However, the model can also be used by individual hospitals to decide initially whether a patient should be placed on the transplant or surgery waiting list. The model can be further adapted and used for the transplant of other organs or similar decisions in medicine. Concurrently with the research and work carried out to develop the two models the investigation focused on the constraints of the current systems used in the UK and the US and the seemingly impossible dilemmas experienced by those having to make the prioritisation decisions. By removing the parameters of objective-only inputs the ‘humanistic’ model eradicates the previous limitations on decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • T Perris & A W Labib, 2004. "An intelligent system for prioritisation of organ transplant patient waiting lists using fuzzy logic," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(2), pages 103-115, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:55:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601552
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601552
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:55:y:2004:i:2:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.