IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v52y2001i1d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis for ruin probabilities: canonical risk model

Author

Listed:
  • F J Vázquez-Abad

    (University of Montreal)

  • P LeQuoc

    (University of Montreal)

Abstract

The surplus process of an insurance portfolio is defined as the wealth obtained by the premium payments minus the reimbursements made at the time of claims. When this process becomes negative (if ever), we say that ruin has occurred. The general setting is the Gambler's Ruin Problem. In this paper we address the problem of estimating derivatives (sensitivities) of ruin probabilities with respect to the rate of accidents. Estimating probabilities of rare events is a challenging problem, since naïve estimation is not applicable. Solution approaches are very recent, mostly through the use of importance sampling techniques. Sensitivity estimation is an even harder problem for these situations. We shall study three methods for estimating ruin probabilities: one via importance sampling (IS), and two others via indirect simulation: the storage process (SP), which restates the problems in terms of a queuing system, and the convolution formula (CF). To estimate the sensitivities, we apply the Rare Perturbation Analysis (RPA) method to IS, the Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis (IPA) method to SP and the score function method to CF. Simulation methods are compared in terms of their efficiency, a criterion that appropriately weighs precision and CPU time. As well, we indicate how other criteria such as set-up time and prior formulae development may actually be problem-dependent.

Suggested Citation

  • F J Vázquez-Abad & P LeQuoc, 2001. "Sensitivity analysis for ruin probabilities: canonical risk model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(1), pages 71-81, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:52:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601030
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601030
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlo Alberto Magni & Stefano Malagoli & Andrea Marchioni & Giovanni Mastroleo, 2020. "Rating firms and sensitivity analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(12), pages 1940-1958, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:52:y:2001:i:1:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.