IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v23y1992i3p443-459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential British and U.S. Adoption Rates of Investments Project Post-Completion Auditing

Author

Listed:
  • C W Neale

    (University of Bradford)

  • Peter J Buckley

    (University of Bradford)

Abstract

A higher proportion of U.S.-owned firms operating in Britain adopts investment post-completion audit (PCA) procedures than that of domestic British enterprises, confirming differential adoption rates for many decision and control procedures found by other studies. Insights to this differential are sought in executives' attitudes to the aims, benefits and drawbacks of post-completion auditing. The absence of clear differences in attitudes among all U.K.-based managers suggest that the differential in PCA adoption stems primarily from ownership factors, e.g., exportation of parental control techniques rather than from the influence of local environmental factors.© 1992 JIBS. Journal of International Business Studies (1992) 23, 443–459

Suggested Citation

  • C W Neale & Peter J Buckley, 1992. "Differential British and U.S. Adoption Rates of Investments Project Post-Completion Auditing," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 23(3), pages 443-459, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:23:y:1992:i:3:p:443-459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v23/n3/pdf/8490274a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v23/n3/full/8490274a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:23:y:1992:i:3:p:443-459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.