IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/gpprii/v50y2025i2d10.1057_s41288-024-00330-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discretionary decisions in capital requirements under Solvency II

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolaus Grochola

    (Goethe University Frankfurt)

  • Sebastian Schlütter

    (Mainz University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

European insurers are allowed to make discretionary decisions in the calculation of Solvency II capital requirements. These choices include the design of risk models (ranging from a standard formula to a full internal model) and the use of long-term guarantees measures. This article examines the situation of insurers that utilize the discretionary scope regarding capital requirements for market risks. In a first step of our analysis, we assess the risk profiles of 49 stock insurers using daily market data. In a second step, we exploit hand-collected Solvency II data for the years 2016 to 2020. We find that long-term guarantees measures substantially influence the reported solvency ratios. The measures are chosen particularly by less solvent insurers and those with high interest rate and sovereign credit risk sensitivities. Internal models are used more frequently by large insurers and especially for market risks for which they have already found adequate immunization strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolaus Grochola & Sebastian Schlütter, 2025. "Discretionary decisions in capital requirements under Solvency II," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 50(2), pages 405-443, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:50:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1057_s41288-024-00330-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41288-024-00330-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41288-024-00330-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41288-024-00330-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:50:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1057_s41288-024-00330-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.