IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of International Insurance Markets*


  • Wei Zheng

    ([1] aDepartment of Risk Management and Insurance, School of Economics, Peking University, Beijing, China. [2] bChina Centre for Insurance and Social Security Research (CCISSR), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.)

  • Yongdong Liu

    (Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.)

  • Yiting Deng

    (China Centre for Economic Research (CCER), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.)


By proposing the Benchmark Ratio of Insurance Penetration (BRIP) as a new paradigm for international insurance comparison, this paper makes a new assessment and comparison of insurance growth levels of certain countries as well as certain economic groups, and further discusses the policy implications. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows. First, it is necessary to have a new recognition of the international insurance growth pattern: the relative level of insurance growth in developed markets has declined as compared with that indicated by traditional indicators, and the relative level of insurance growth in developing markets has increased. The relative growth level of the insurance industry in developed markets is still higher than that in developing markets, but the insurance industry in emerging markets and Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) is undergoing rapid development and has achieved a relatively high level. Second, when considering global expansion strategy, insurance companies should not only continue to consolidate market share in developed markets but also actively explore developing markets. In the meantime, insurance companies need to pay special attention to the fact that the relative insurance growth of emerging markets and BRIC has already reached a relatively high level. Although there is still significant potential for growth, the growth will mainly be driven by the ordinary economic factors, and the pattern of insurance growth would be expected to experience great changes. Third, the insurance industry policy for developing countries should focus on the adjustment and improvement of the pattern of growth instead of the quantitative increase in growth, so as to build a solid foundation for sustainable insurance growth in the long-term future. Fourth, the traditional paradigms are confined by certain limitations, so that we have to establish a more solid paradigm for international insurance comparison. By doing so, we can build a more reasonable foundation for international cooperation in insurance regulation and for relevant negotiation of international trade. The Geneva Papers (2009) 34, 85–99. doi:10.1057/gpp.2008.37

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zheng & Yongdong Liu & Yiting Deng, 2009. "A Comparative Study of International Insurance Markets*," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 34(1), pages 85-99, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:85-99

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Chiu, Yi-Bin, 2016. "Globalization and insurance activity: Evidence on the industrial and emerging countries," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 328-349.
    2. Guo, Feng & Huang, Ying Sophie, 2013. "Identifying permanent and transitory risks in the Chinese property insurance market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 689-704.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:85-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.