IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

A Comparative Study of International Insurance Markets*

Listed author(s):
  • Wei Zheng

    ([1] aDepartment of Risk Management and Insurance, School of Economics, Peking University, Beijing, China. [2] bChina Centre for Insurance and Social Security Research (CCISSR), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.)

  • Yongdong Liu

    (Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.)

  • Yiting Deng

    (China Centre for Economic Research (CCER), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.)

Registered author(s):

    By proposing the Benchmark Ratio of Insurance Penetration (BRIP) as a new paradigm for international insurance comparison, this paper makes a new assessment and comparison of insurance growth levels of certain countries as well as certain economic groups, and further discusses the policy implications. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows. First, it is necessary to have a new recognition of the international insurance growth pattern: the relative level of insurance growth in developed markets has declined as compared with that indicated by traditional indicators, and the relative level of insurance growth in developing markets has increased. The relative growth level of the insurance industry in developed markets is still higher than that in developing markets, but the insurance industry in emerging markets and Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) is undergoing rapid development and has achieved a relatively high level. Second, when considering global expansion strategy, insurance companies should not only continue to consolidate market share in developed markets but also actively explore developing markets. In the meantime, insurance companies need to pay special attention to the fact that the relative insurance growth of emerging markets and BRIC has already reached a relatively high level. Although there is still significant potential for growth, the growth will mainly be driven by the ordinary economic factors, and the pattern of insurance growth would be expected to experience great changes. Third, the insurance industry policy for developing countries should focus on the adjustment and improvement of the pattern of growth instead of the quantitative increase in growth, so as to build a solid foundation for sustainable insurance growth in the long-term future. Fourth, the traditional paradigms are confined by certain limitations, so that we have to establish a more solid paradigm for international insurance comparison. By doing so, we can build a more reasonable foundation for international cooperation in insurance regulation and for relevant negotiation of international trade. The Geneva Papers (2009) 34, 85–99. doi:10.1057/gpp.2008.37

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Palgrave Macmillan & The Geneva Association in its journal The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice.

    Volume (Year): 34 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 1 (January)
    Pages: 85-99

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:85-99
    Contact details of provider: Web page:


    Route de Malagnou 53, CH - 1208 Geneva

    Phone: +41-22 707 66 00
    Fax: +41-22 736 75 36
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:85-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)

    or (Rebekah McClure)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.