IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/gpprii/v27y2002i2d10.1111_1468-0440.00169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does WTC Matter for the Investment Policy of P/C Insurance Companies?

Author

Listed:
  • Paul M Achleitner

    (Allianz, AG)

  • Jorg H Biebel

    (Allianz, AG)

  • Daniel Wichels

    (Allianz, AG)

Abstract

The attack on the World Trade Center (WTC) had a serious double impact on insurance companies, revealing a significant correlation between the asset and liability sides of their balance sheets. Insurance companies that previously considered themselves well capitalized, suddenly felt vulnerable to simultaneous shocks to their risk-absorbing capital. The unprecedented simultaneous shock challenges the previous investment assumption of P/C insurers that there is no major relation between underwriting and investment risks. The direct and indirect impact of WTC on the investment policy is threefold. First, the stronger correlation between underwriting and investment risks implies a lower overall investment risk absorption capacity. Second, an active or index-based investment attitude should be augmented by a more elaborated ALM-based counterparty risk controlling. Third, the general “risk appetite” of P/C insurers must be reviewed. All in all, a deeper knowledge and better understanding of the underwritten risk structure is necessary to derive an optimal investment policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul M Achleitner & Jorg H Biebel & Daniel Wichels, 2002. "Does WTC Matter for the Investment Policy of P/C Insurance Companies?," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 27(2), pages 275-282, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:27:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1111_1468-0440.00169
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-0440.00169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1111/1468-0440.00169
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-0440.00169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:27:y:2002:i:2:d:10.1111_1468-0440.00169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.