IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v27y2015i5p707-726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Means to an End: The Importance of the Research Question for Systematic Reviews in International Development

Author

Listed:
  • Henrik Hansen

    (Department of Economics and DERG, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark)

  • Neda Trifković

    (Department of Economics and DERG, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark)

Abstract

Systematic reviews are increasingly used to inform policy makers about the usefulness of interventions. We stress the importance of the research question and argue that traditional Cochrane reviews work best for the focused question ‘what works’, while many policy interventions give rise to complex questions such as ‘when’, ‘why’, ‘how’ and ‘for whom’ the interventions ‘work’. We categorise the questions and use this as a basis for a typology of systematic reviews. We illustrate the usefulness of the typology by examining reviews of development interventions. These reviews have followed a general trend, moving from focused questions to complex questions, and this gives rise to the same problems and discussions about evidence-ranking and the use of programme theory as witnessed within systematic reviews of interventions in public health and education. We argue that the review question is a natural starting point for developing new practices for systematic reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrik Hansen & Neda Trifković, 2015. "Means to an End: The Importance of the Research Question for Systematic Reviews in International Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 27(5), pages 707-726, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:27:y:2015:i:5:p:707-726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v27/n5/pdf/ejdr201454a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v27/n5/full/ejdr201454a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:27:y:2015:i:5:p:707-726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.