IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v23y2011i2p191-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The PRS Approach and the Paris Agenda: Experiences in Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua

Author

Listed:
  • Geske Dijkstra

    (Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Kristin Komives

    (International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness stipulates that broadly owned and results-oriented national plans will be the basis for establishing national ownership and leadership of the aid process and for improving alignment and harmonization. In this sense, there is a close link between the Poverty Reduction Strategy approach and the Paris Agenda, both of which form part of the new aid paradigm that started around the year 2000. This article assesses the actual progress in the implementation of the new aid paradigm in three Latin American countries: Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua. The results are disappointing. Frequent government changes and the composition of the donor group in the countries are partially responsible for the disappointing results, but the main conclusion is that the new aid paradigm is based on unrealistic expectations about the role that national poverty reduction or development plans can play in promoting the principles of the Paris Agenda.La Déclaration de Paris sur l’efficacité de l’aide au développement compte sur l’élaboration de plans nationaux axés sur les résultats afin de renforcer l’appropriation et la maîtrise nationale de l’aide au développement, ainsi que favoriser l’alignement et l’harmonisation de l’aide. Dans ce sens, il existe un lien étroit entre les approches basées sur des Stratégies de Réduction de la Pauvreté et celle de la Déclaration de Paris, les deux étant des composantes du nouveau paradigme d’aide au développement qui a vu le jour vers l’an 2000. Cet article évalue les progrès réalisés dans la mise en œuvre de ce nouveau paradigme d’aide dans trois pays d’Amériques latine et centrale: la Bolivie, le Honduras et le Nicaragua. Les résultats sont décevants. Des changements fréquents de gouvernements et la composition des groupes de donateurs dans ces trois pays expliquent en partie ces résultats décevants, mais notre conclusion principale est que le nouveau paradigme d’aide est basé sur des attentes non réalistes concernant le rôle que les plans nationaux de développement ou de réduction de la pauvreté peuvent jouer dans la promotion des principes de la Déclaration de Paris.

Suggested Citation

  • Geske Dijkstra & Kristin Komives, 2011. "The PRS Approach and the Paris Agenda: Experiences in Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 23(2), pages 191-207, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:23:y:2011:i:2:p:191-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v23/n2/pdf/ejdr201030a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v23/n2/full/ejdr201030a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:23:y:2011:i:2:p:191-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.