IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v21y2009i4p662-674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU's Response to China's Africa Safari: Can Triangular Co‐operation Match Needs?

Author

Listed:
  • Uwe Wissenbach

    (Delegation of the European Commission in Korea.)

Abstract

La politique africaine de la Chine n’est pas sans incidence sur les relations de l’UE tant avec la Chine qu’avec l’Afrique. Par conséquenti UE a proposé une coopération trilatérale afin de dégager les synergies entre les contributions potentielles respectives de l’UE et de la Chine au développement des pays africains. Cet article adopte une perspective de relations internationales afin de caractériser ce rapport triangulaire au-delà de ce que proposent des approches empiriques ou économiques bien connues. Il se penche en particulier sur la Chine en tant qu’acteur en Afrique. L'anteur se demande si la Chine est en Afrique parce qu’elle est forte ou faible, etil examine l’impact de l’approche trilatérale de l’UE sur l’Afrique en tant qu’acteur sur la scène internationale.European Journal of Development Research (2009) 21, 662–674. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2009.25

Suggested Citation

  • Uwe Wissenbach, 2009. "The EU's Response to China's Africa Safari: Can Triangular Co‐operation Match Needs?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 21(4), pages 662-674, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:21:y:2009:i:4:p:662-674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v21/n4/pdf/ejdr200925a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v21/n4/full/ejdr200925a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simplice Asongu, 2014. "Sino-African relations: a review and reconciliation of dominant schools of thought," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 14/037, African Governance and Development Institute..
    2. Dewei Che & Adams Bodomo, 2023. "China and the European Union in Africa: win–win-lose or win–win-win?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 119-136, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:21:y:2009:i:4:p:662-674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.