IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Hunger, Discourse and the Policy Process: How do Conceptualizations of the Problem of ‘Hunger’ Affect its Measurement and Solution?

Listed author(s):
  • Ian MacAuslan

    (Consultant, Social Policy, Oxford Policy Management)

Registered author(s):

    This paper applies ‘policy processes’ literature to constructions of hunger. Problem conceptualization and associated solutions are understood as shaped by discourse, rhetoric and interests. Two constructions of the problem of ‘hunger’ are analysed: hunger as lack of food, associated with the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and hunger as malnutrition, associated with the World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). While both conceptualizations agree hunger is a vital problem, the FAO's construction reflects its mandate on agricultural production, and the WHO's and UNICEF's construction supports their mandates on health and children. Although both conceptualizations are used to measure progress towards the ‘hunger’ Millennium Development Goal, the different conceptions, and associated measurements, have diverging implications for the direction of resources.Cet article applique la littérature ‘des processus politiques’ à des interprétations du problème de la faim. La question de la conceptualisation et les solutions associées sont formées par le discours, la rhétorique et les intérêts. Deux interprétations du problèmes de la faim sont analysées: la faim comme manque de nourriture, appliquée par l'Organisation pour l'Alimentation et l'Agriculture (FAO), et la faim perçue comme malnutrition, mise en œuvre par l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) et l'UNICEF. Alors que ces deux conceptualisations s’accordent sur le caractère vital du problème, l'interprétation de la FAO reflète son mandat relatif à la production agricole, pendant que celle de l'OMS et de l'UNICEF s’appuie sur leurs mandats concernant la santé et les enfants. Bien que ces conceptualisations soient toutes deux utilisées pour mesurer les progrès par rapport à l'objectif du millénaire portant sur la lutte contre la faim, les interprétations différentes et les mesures associées ont des effets divergents concernant l'utilisation des ressources.European Journal of Development Research (2009) 21, 397–418. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2009.13; published online 14 May 2009

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Palgrave Macmillan & European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) in its journal European Journal of Development Research.

    Volume (Year): 21 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 3 (July)
    Pages: 397-418

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:21:y:2009:i:3:p:397-418
    Contact details of provider: Web page:


    24 RUE ROTHSCHILD, P.O. BOX 272, CH-1211 GENEVA 21

    Phone: (41) 22-731-46-48
    Fax: (41) 22-738-57-97
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:21:y:2009:i:3:p:397-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)

    or (Rebekah McClure)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.