IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ecolmr/v3y2009i6p26-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour disputes in 2008

Author

Listed:
  • Dominic Hale

    (Office for National Statistics)

Abstract

Labour disputes led to 758,800 working days being lost in the UK in 2008. In total, there were 144 stoppages of work, 94 per cent of which were in the public sector.This article analyses the three main measures of labour disputes - working days lost, stoppages and workers involved - by industry, region, cause, size and duration. The statistics are put into context by considering estimates of working days lost per 1,000 employees and working time lost through strikes as a proportion of time actually worked.Data are taken from a number of sources including regular centralised returns from some industries and public bodies, as well as directly from the employer or trade union involved after ONS has been notified of a dispute from press reports. Economic & Labour Market Review (2009) 3, 26–38; doi:10.1057/elmr.2009.89

Suggested Citation

  • Dominic Hale, 2009. "Labour disputes in 2008," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 3(6), pages 26-38, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:3:y:2009:i:6:p:26-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v3/n6/pdf/elmr200989a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v3/n6/full/elmr200989a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:3:y:2009:i:6:p:26-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.