IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ecolmr/v2y2008i9p37-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The preliminary R&D satellite account for the UK: a sensitivity analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Evans

    (Office for National Statistics)

  • Michael Hatcher

    (Office for National Statistics)

  • Damian Whittard

    (Office for National Statistics)

Abstract

Builds on previous work in this journal which treated R & D expenditure as investment in an intangible scientific assetThis article builds on previous work in Economic & Labour Market Review which treated expenditure on research and development as investment in an intangible scientific asset, in line with proposed revisions to the System ofNational Accounts (SNA). The purpose of the analysis is to communicate to users the degree of sensitivity of the results previously presented to changesin the key assumptions. The analysis is part of a wider Office for National Statistics contribution to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Developmentwork updating the 1993 SNA, and was presented at the International Association for Research on Income and Wealth conference in Slovenia in August 2008. Economic & Labour Market Review (2008) 2, 37–43; doi:10.1057/elmr.2008.138

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Evans & Michael Hatcher & Damian Whittard, 2008. "The preliminary R&D satellite account for the UK: a sensitivity analysis," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 2(9), pages 37-43, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:2:y:2008:i:9:p:37-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v2/n9/pdf/elmr2008138a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v2/n9/full/elmr2008138a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haskel, J & Goodridge, P & Hughes, A & Wallis, G, 2015. "The contribution of public and private R&D to UK productivity growth," Working Papers 21171, Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:2:y:2008:i:9:p:37-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.