IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ecolmr/v2y2008i5p18-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons between unemployment and the claimant count: 1971 to 2007

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Clegg

    (Office for National Statistics)

Abstract

Explains the conceptual differences and also examines the differences between the two measures by dataThe number of unemployed people is currently more than twice as high as the claimant count, which measures the number of people claiming unemployment-related benefits. This article explains the conceptual differences between unemployment and the claimant count.The article also examines the differences between the two measures by gender. The gap between unemployment and the claimant count is larger for women than for men, with female unemployment being consistently higher than the female claimant count throughout the period 1971 to 2007. However, for men, throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, the claimant count exceeded unemployment. Since the late 1990s, however, male unemployment has exceeded the male claimant count and the gap is widening. For men, but not for women, the gap between the claimant count and unemployment seems to be significantly affected by the economic cycle as the male claimant count has exceeded male unemployment during periods of high unemployment. Economic & Labour Market Review (2008) 2, 18–20; doi:10.1057/elmr.2008.70

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Clegg, 2008. "Comparisons between unemployment and the claimant count: 1971 to 2007," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 2(5), pages 18-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:2:y:2008:i:5:p:18-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v2/n5/pdf/elmr200870a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v2/n5/full/elmr200870a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donald Houston, 2020. "Local resistance to rising unemployment in the context of the COVID‐19 mitigation policies across Great Britain," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 1189-1209, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:2:y:2008:i:5:p:18-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.