What Can We Learn from Education Production Studies?
The results of a Becker–Peltzman–Stigler model of local school district decision-making yields biased or inconsistent efficiency measures when some school outputs are not measured. Empirical investigation of data for 95 Tennessee counties in the 1999–2000 academic year finds that Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) efficiency measures, and efficiency rankings based on those measures, are highly sensitive to changes in the number of output measures used. An artifact of the DEA process causes increasing correlation of efficiency scores with the inverse of per pupil expenditures as outputs increase. Hence, high-stakes policy initiatives should not be based on such scores.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 36 (2010)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/|
Postal:c/o Dr. Alexandre Olbrecht, The Anisfield School of Business 205, Ramapo College, 505 Ramapo Valley Road, Ramapo, New Jersey 07430, USA
Phone: (201) 684-7346
Web page: https://www.qu.edu/eea/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/41302|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:easeco:v:36:y:2010:i:4:p:450-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.