Is More Always Better? Empirical Evidence on Optimal Portfolio Size
A restriction on portfolio size results in welfare losses for investors. To measure these welfare losses, we compare n-asset optimal portfolios with 26-asset optimal portfolios using the concept of proportionate opportunity cost. The original historical asset returns data are used with a VAR in generating joint returns distributions for the portfolio formation period. We find that suboptimal diversification imposes substantial costs on investors with low levels of relative risk aversion. Investors with high levels of risk aversion incur very small or no cost at all diversifying sub-optimally. We show that investors with high levels of risk aversion place most of their initial wealth in the safe asset and, therefore, few stocks are needed to achieve optimal diversification. Eastern Economic Journal (2009) 35, 84–95. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050045
Volume (Year): 35 (2009 Winter)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/|
Postal:c/o Dr. Alexandre Olbrecht, The Anisfield School of Business 205, Ramapo College, 505 Ramapo Valley Road, Ramapo, New Jersey 07430, USA
Phone: (201) 684-7346
Web page: https://www.qu.edu/eea/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/41302|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:easeco:v:35:y:2009:i:1:p:84-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.