IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/crepre/v24y2021i2d10.1057_s41299-019-00091-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right: Journalists’ Perceptions and Usage of Press Releases

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie Formentin

    (Towson University)

  • Kirstie Hettinga

    (Department of Communication, California Lutheran University)

  • Alyssa Appelman

    (Northern Kentucky University)

Abstract

Exploring reputation and organizational communication, this study tests how journalists perceive press releases containing grammatical errors. Journalists (n = 118) read a press release with or without errors from an existing or unknown company. Journalists ranked the press releases without errors more favorably, regardless of their perceptions of the company. Additionally, press releases from the existing company were ranked more favorably than those from the unknown one, regardless of errors. Notably, there were no interaction effects, which suggests that reputation cannot overcome negative error effects and that polished writing cannot overcome negative corporate perception effects. Implications for the public relations–journalism relationship are discussed, as is the legitimacy of using unknown organizations when testing reputation via experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie Formentin & Kirstie Hettinga & Alyssa Appelman, 2021. "Two Wrongs Don’t Make a Right: Journalists’ Perceptions and Usage of Press Releases," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 65-75, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:24:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1057_s41299-019-00091-z
    DOI: 10.1057/s41299-019-00091-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41299-019-00091-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41299-019-00091-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:24:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1057_s41299-019-00091-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.