Was the Gradual Approach Not Possible in the USSR? A Critique of the Sachs-Woo ‘Impossibility Hypothesis’
This paper examines the Sachs-Woo hypothesis that the gradual approach to reform, though successful in China, was not possible in the USSR because of structural differences between these two economies. To examine this hypothesis, this paper abstracts from the issue of structural differences by focusing on the industrial sector only and compares the state-owned enterprise (SOE) reforms in China under Deng and in the USSR under Gorbachev. Apart from concerning the same sector, these reforms were roughly contemporaneous, and hence their comparison provides a suitable test of the Sachs-Woo hypothesis. The test shows that the hypothesis does not live up to it.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 53 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK|
Web: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/pal/subscribe/index.html Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:compes:v:53:y:2011:i:1:p:83-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Daniel Foley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.