IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pai/apunup/en-82-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of scientific research groups with greater productive applicability in Brazil: capacities and interactions with firms

Author

Listed:
  • Thiago Caliari
  • Tulio Chiarini

Abstract

This paper analyzes the capacities of BR Survey Research Groups in generating science and technology, and how these groups may be associated with university-firm interactions. To this end, we perform a classification based on the diagram proposed by Stokes (2005), using the qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) statistical technique. As a primary result, we find that scientific and technological capacity on the part of the research groups is not a necessary condition for interactions with companies. Indeed, some research groups without high scientific and technological capacity make more interactions (in terms of the total amount) and yield similar values in the analysis (relative to the number of researchers) in comparison with the most qualified groups: those located in Pasteur’s quadrant.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiago Caliari & Tulio Chiarini, 2018. "Analysis of scientific research groups with greater productive applicability in Brazil: capacities and interactions with firms," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 45(82), pages 71-98.
    • Handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:en-82-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/864/1068
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:en-82-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiuppe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.