IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact de la crise économique en République Centrafricaine: Analyse quantitative et qualitative / Impact of the Economic Crisis in the Central African Republic: Quantitative and Qualitative analyses


  • Léa Salmon
  • Josias Tebero
  • Quentin Wodon


Cet article analyse l'impact de la crise économique sur la situation des ménages en République centrafricaine en se basant sur une analyse quantitative de la dernière enquête auprès des ménages et une analyse qualitative basée sur des données provenant de groupes de discussion. Trois principales conclusions émergent de l'analyse quantitative. Premièrement, l'impact de la hausse des prix des denrées alimentaires devrait avoir eu un impact limité sur la plupart des ménages, essentiellement parce qu'une bonne partie de la population ne consomme pas de quantités importantes des denrées dont les prix ont augmenté sur les marchés mondiaux. Deuxièmement, la majorité des ménages a tendance à être affectée par une grande variété de chocs. Troisièmement, les mécanismes de solidarité sur lesquels les ménages peuvent compter pour faire face aux chocs sont limités. L’analyse qualitative révèle une image un peu différente puisque les groupes de discussion suggèrent que la crise a eu un impact négatif important sur eux. Les mauvaises conditions climatiques ont aussi joué un rôle dans la détérioration des conditions de vie des ménages. Les groupes de discussion confirment la faiblesse des mécanismes de solidarité sur lesquels les ménages pouvaient compter en cas de choc. Ainsi, si l'impact de la crise sur la population a été moins important en comparaison à d’autres pays, en raison de l’isolement relatif de la RCA des marchés mondiaux, il a tout de même été significatif. This article analyses the impact of the economic crisis (including the increase in food prices) on the well-being of household in the Central African Republic, relying on both a quantitative analysis of the latest household survey available and a qualitative analysis through focus groups. Three main conclusions emerge from the quantitative analysis. First, the impact of the increase in international food prices may have been more limited for most households due to the fact that a large share of the population does not consume imported foods or immediate substitutes. Second, a majority of households are affected by a wide variety of shocks. Third, the mechanisms of solidarity on which household can rely to cope with such shocks are limited. The qualitative analysis suggests a slightly different picture since participants in focus groups suggest that the crisis had a strong negative impact on them. This is especially the case for public sector workers, those in export industries and craftsmen and retailers. Poor climatic conditions also played a role in the deterioration of living standards. The focus groups confirm the lack of sufficient mechanisms of solidarity to help households cope with shocks. Thus, if the impact of the crisis on the population may have been smaller than in other countries owing to the relative isolation of the CAR from world markets, for those households that were affected by the crisis, the negative impact was still significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Léa Salmon & Josias Tebero & Quentin Wodon, 2010. "Impact de la crise économique en République Centrafricaine: Analyse quantitative et qualitative / Impact of the Economic Crisis in the Central African Republic: Quantitative and Qualitative analyses," Perspective Afrique, Association Africaine pour les Sciences sociales, vol. 5(1-3), pages 1-26.
  • Handle: RePEc:paf:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1-3:p:1-26

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Poverty; economic crisis; Central African Republic;

    JEL classification:

    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:paf:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1-3:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Webmestre Perspaf). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.