IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Should We Continue the Process of Researching for Business or Give it up Because of the Crises?

Listed author(s):
  • Savescu Dan


    („Transilvania” University of Brasov, Faculty of Technological Engineering)

  • Sima Mihaela-Georgia


    (Bucharest Chamber of Commerce and Industry)

  • Bârsan Simona-Clara


    (Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation of Cluj-Napoca)

Registered author(s):

    Paper presents the permanent process of research for business, its compulsory steps, the role of innovation and business incubators, as supporting element for SME’s growth, especially in a crises period. Beside the facilities offered to SMEs, other benefits come from creating a business incubator, such as: developing innovative products, product design, prototyping, technological transfer and nevertheless, registration and exploitation of intellectual property rights, coming from the obtained products. All these contribute to the improvement of SMEs obtained results, reflecting into the national economy. In order to be even more practical, we chose an example of a functional business incubator, ITA Pro-Energ, and showed the facilities that it offers to its eleven incubated SMEs, as well as their improvement on market position

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences in its journal Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series.

    Volume (Year): X (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 (October)
    Pages: 719-723

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:719-723
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:719-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gheorghiu Gabriela)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.