IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Controversies Regarding the Necessity of an Integrated Supervision for the EU-27 Financial Markets

Listed author(s):
  • SARGU Alina Camelia


    („Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Ia?i, Doctoral School of Economics)

As the European financial markets suffered substantial structural changes in the least decades, under the influence of the financial innovation process, the question regarding the efficiency of an integrated supervision model rather than a specialised one becomes more challenging. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the different models used by each European Union member states, underlining in this way the current state of the supervision integration in the EU-27 and the controversies regarding the necessity of an integrated supervision system for the national financial markets. Thus, the paper compares the pros and cons arguments regarding the adoption of an integrated model for financial supervision. Overall the study highlights that although, in general, a specific model for financial supervision is adopted taking into consideration the political, historical and structural aspects of the financial systems, in recent years a trend for integration has become very visible.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences in its journal Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series.

Volume (Year): X (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 (May)
Pages: 351-355

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:351-355
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:351-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gheorghiu Gabriela)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.