IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbrobs/v41y2026i1p78-117..html

Edutainment to Prevent Violence Against Women and Children

Author

Listed:
  • Amber Peterman

Abstract

Edutainment has potential to drive large-scale behavior change, yet its effectiveness in addressing violence against women and children remains an emerging field of study. This review summarizes findings from 21 rigorous studies measuring impacts on violence-related attitudes, norms and behaviors. Overall, 71 percent of 21 studies show promising reductions in attitudes and norms supporting violence, while 64 percent of 11 studies document reductions in violent behaviors. The largest evidence base pertains to violence against women with relatively moderate findings (13 studies, 57–69 percent show protective impacts). Evidence on child, early and forced marriage is stronger, however based on fewer studies (8 studies, 63–75 percent show protective impacts). Promising yet few studies tackle female genital mutilation, and only one study, with insignificant effects, addresses violence against children. While adverse impacts are rare, several studies report variable outcomes depending on study arm, follow-up period, or target group. Mechanisms of impact towards violence reduction include information acquisition, individual persuasion, norm diffusion, and enhanced service linkages. Despite these encouraging findings, further research is needed to address methodological challenges and unlock edutainment's full potential for large-scale violence-related behavior change.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber Peterman, 2026. "Edutainment to Prevent Violence Against Women and Children," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 41(1), pages 78-117.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbrobs:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:78-117.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wbro/lkaf002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbrobs:v:41:y:2026:i:1:p:78-117.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.