IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v40y2026i1p172-195..html

Volume, Risk, Complexity: What Makes Development Finance Projects Succeed or Fail?

Author

Listed:
  • Yota Eilers
  • Jochen Kluve
  • Jörg Langbein
  • Lennart Reiners

Abstract

This study presents a quantitative analysis of the determinants of success—and failure—of bilateral development finance projects, based on a unique database covering 5,608 project evaluation results. Linking project success ratings to a comprehensive and partly novel set of explanatory factors along the project life cycle, four research hypotheses are investigated, finding that (I) development finance projects with comprehensive financing are (slightly) more successful, in particular budget funds show a significant positive correlation; (II) the project structure does not significantly influence project success; (III) more-complex development finance projects are less successful, in particular in terms of technical complexity and longer implementation duration; (IV) riskier projects are significantly less successful.

Suggested Citation

  • Yota Eilers & Jochen Kluve & Jörg Langbein & Lennart Reiners, 2026. "Volume, Risk, Complexity: What Makes Development Finance Projects Succeed or Fail?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 40(1), pages 172-195.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:172-195.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhaf001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:172-195.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.