IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v39y2025i2p377-409..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Survey and Geospatial Data for Geographical Targeting of the Poor and Vulnerable: Evidence from Malawi

Author

Listed:
  • Melany Gualavisi
  • David Newhouse

Abstract

To address the challenge of identifying the poorest villages in developing countries, this study introduces a cost-effective strategy that leverages a combination of household consumption surveys, geospatial data, and a partial registry. The study simulates a partial registry, containing data from 450 villages across 10 impoverished districts of Malawi, and contains proxy poverty indicators. These indicators are used to impute estimates of household per capita consumption, which in turn are used to train a prediction model using publicly available geospatial data. This method is evaluated against an imputed reference of village welfare, derived from the 2016 household survey. The partial registry approach is benchmarked against three alternatives: proxy means test scores, the Meta Relative Wealth Index, and predictions from household surveys with geospatial indicators. Results show the partial registry model's rank correlation with actual welfare measures at 0.75, outperforming the other methods significantly, which ranged from −0.02 to 0.2. These findings hold under various robustness checks, including the addition of Gaussian noise, indicating that collecting household-level proxy poverty data in low-income areas can significantly improve the performance of machine learning models that integrate survey and satellite imagery data for village-level geographic targeting.

Suggested Citation

  • Melany Gualavisi & David Newhouse, 2025. "Integrating Survey and Geospatial Data for Geographical Targeting of the Poor and Vulnerable: Evidence from Malawi," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 39(2), pages 377-409.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:377-409.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhae025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:377-409.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.