IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v29y2026i1pjyaf039..html

The silent majority and the power of social constructs: how the Kitagawa scandal perpetuated sexual violence

Author

Listed:
  • Yukiko Nishikawa

Abstract

This study examines Japan’s prolonged public silence despite widespread awareness of Johnny Kitagawa’s decades-long sexual abuse, a prominent business magnate, and talent producer. The case demonstrates that conventional gender-based explanations for silence are insufficient, particularly in contexts involving male victims. The analysis highlights socially embedded mechanisms in Japan that shape individual and collective behaviour. The primary focus is the social construct of seken (often translated as ‘society’), which provides the normative framework that underpins the social order. In addition, social scripts, such as kūki o yomu (‘reading the mood or situation’) and sontaku (‘anticipatory obedience’), are equally significant. These practices generate implicit expectations of conformity, thereby contributing to the maintenance of the social order of seken. Rather than treating them solely as cultural traits, this study conceptualizes them as mechanisms through which social norms are enacted and complicity is reinforced. By examining these micro-social dynamics, the study clarifies how avoidance, indirectness, and compliance are normalized, sustaining public silence. This framework offers a more rigorous lens for analysing societal responses to sexual abuse in Japan and contributes to broader debates on the social conditions that perpetuate silence and enable abuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Yukiko Nishikawa, 2026. "The silent majority and the power of social constructs: how the Kitagawa scandal perpetuated sexual violence," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 1-039..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:29:y:2026:i:1:p:jyaf039.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyaf039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:29:y:2026:i:1:p:jyaf039.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.