IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v28y2025i2p979-1014..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does contact improve intergroup attitudes? Evidence from Japanese perceptions of Chinese and South Koreans

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng Cai

Abstract

How can in-group members enhance their perceptions of out-groups? Most scholars emphasize intergroup contact as a key factor. Specifically, they often advocate for face-to-face or direct contact. However, the Japanese context presents a contradiction to this suggestion. For Japanese people, the most frequently encountered foreign nationalities are Chinese and South Koreans, yet they exhibit the most negative attitudes towards these groups. I propose that the monocultural, peaceful, and conservative nature of Japanese society may hinder the realization of the assumptions underlying direct contact. Drawing on advanced studies in intergroup contact theory, I adopt a comparative approach to determine which form of contact is more effective. My findings indicate that viewing Chinese films, a form of parasocial contact, can more positively influence Japanese perceptions of Chinese people than direct communication. This conclusion also applies to the Japanese perspective on South Koreans. Consequently, this study offers a broader social strategy for fostering improved bilateral relations in East Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng Cai, 2025. "Does contact improve intergroup attitudes? Evidence from Japanese perceptions of Chinese and South Koreans," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 979-1014.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:979-1014.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyaf008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:979-1014.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.