IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v27y2024i2p231-239..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partisanship and attribution of responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Kakeru Okamoto
  • Masahiro Zenkyo

Abstract

This study examines the attribution of responsibility for government failures during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Japan—specifically, responsibility for the collapse of the healthcare system. The intent is to reveal which political actors Japanese voters hold accountable and how partisanship is associated with perceptions of responsibility. While there have been previous studies on retrospective voting in Japan, little empirical work has been done to shed light on the attribution of responsibility. Based on the results of an online survey conducted in four prefectures in August 2021, this study yields two main findings. First, Japanese voters tend to blame national politicians rather than local officials or government employees for the failures of the healthcare system, and are particularly likely to attribute responsibility to the prime minister as well as to politicians from the ruling and opposition parties. Second, both positive and negative partisanship are associated with attribution of responsibility, and negative partisanship is more strongly correlated with attribution of responsibility than positive partisanship. Thus, negative partisanship plays an important role in shaping voters’ perceptions of government failures in Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Kakeru Okamoto & Masahiro Zenkyo, 2024. "Partisanship and attribution of responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 231-239.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:27:y:2024:i:2:p:231-239.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyae023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:27:y:2024:i:2:p:231-239.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.