IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v25y2022i2p247-272..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three is Company, Four is a Crowd? Perceptions of Cultural Diversity in the Workplace
[‘Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments’]

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe ORSINI
  • Remy MAGNIER-WATANABE

Abstract

Cultural diversity has gained increased validation as a source of greater performance in the context of globalization. This paper examines whether there is an optimum number of foreign coworkers in order to maximize the perceived benefits and minimize the perceived threats of cultural diversity at work. Using a questionnaire survey of 572 Japanese, we found that for perceived benefits of cultural diversity at work, there is no difference between having zero or a token foreign coworker, while more foreign coworkers are associated with moderately higher perceived benefits. For perceived threats, there is a U-shaped relationship whereby interacting with zero or more than three foreign coworkers is linked to higher perceived threats compared to that of only a few foreign coworkers. Our findings reveal that in the Japanese context, interacting with about three foreign coworkers can maximize the perceived benefits while minimizing the perceived threats of cultural diversity in the workplace. Considering diversity in absolute rather than relative terms is an important contribution and implication for business and policy, as Japan and Japanese firms are increasingly dependent on globalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe ORSINI & Remy MAGNIER-WATANABE, 2022. "Three is Company, Four is a Crowd? Perceptions of Cultural Diversity in the Workplace [‘Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments’]," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 247-272.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:25:y:2022:i:2:p:247-272.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyac003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:25:y:2022:i:2:p:247-272.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.