IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v24y2021i2p347-367..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Japanese Red Cross Society’s Emergency Responses in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945
[‘Hiroshima no hito no itami wa watashi no itami’ (Hiroshima’s Pain is My Pain)]

Author

Listed:
  • Michiko SUZUKI

Abstract

The previously unstudied records of the Japanese Red Cross Society (JRCS) narrate the heroic tale of the Red Cross personnel who carried out the organisation’s emergency response in the immediate aftermath of the nuclear detonations in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945. Aid workers began relief activities on the day of the bombings, while many themselves were suffering from injuries and radiation sickness. They treated civilians, soldiers, and Allied POWs without discrimination. Why did these aid-givers choose to work for the Red Cross in the face of such extreme risk? Why were they willing to walk into ground zero to render aid to survivors? JRCS records make clear that, as well-trained nurses and doctors, most aid workers understood the mortal dangers they faced from radioactive poisoning. This article argues that their actions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were attributable to strict quasi-military training, which transcended the ideology of the JRCS as an imperialist institution. Their emergency responses demonstrate the extent to which Red Cross workers had internalised their professional mission as medical aid-givers and eventually emerged as exemplars of the humanitarian relief ideal.

Suggested Citation

  • Michiko SUZUKI, 2021. "The Japanese Red Cross Society’s Emergency Responses in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945 [‘Hiroshima no hito no itami wa watashi no itami’ (Hiroshima’s Pain is My Pain)]," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 347-367.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:347-367.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyab026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:347-367.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.