IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v24y2021i2p311-326..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symptomatic Trauma: Japan, Drug Addiction, and the Limits of Treatment
[‘What is Recovery? A Working Definition from the Betty Ford Institute’]

Author

Listed:
  • Paul CHRISTENSEN

Abstract

Possession and use of illegal drugs carry harsh penalties in Japan if an individual is apprehended by authorities. These severe legal restrictions stigmatize drug use while failing to eliminate narcotics from Japan. This makes individual efforts to take on recovery difficult, as admissions of past use are often met with fear and disdain. Drug Addiction Rehabilitation Center (DARC) is a Japanese organization that helps individuals work a program based on Narcotics Anonymous (NA), while providing members a place to spend their days free from temptation or judgment. Underestimated in this program is how DARC members drug use is often a symptomatic response to interpersonal trauma and struggles to meet societal expectations of success. I argue here that an NA influenced approach to recovery, typically the only option available to those seeking help in Japan, struggles to acknowledge contextual and societal factors that motivated members to begin using drugs. In doing so, I show the necessity for comprehensive change to the ways in which Japan understands, perceives, and treats those labeled as addicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul CHRISTENSEN, 2021. "Symptomatic Trauma: Japan, Drug Addiction, and the Limits of Treatment [‘What is Recovery? A Working Definition from the Betty Ford Institute’]," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 311-326.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:311-326.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyab025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:24:y:2021:i:2:p:311-326.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.