IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v21y2018i2p305-328..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Distributional Effect of Japan’s Equal Employment Opportunity Act on the Gender Wage Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Nelson MARTÍNEZ DAHBURA

Abstract

This research evaluates the distributional impact of the Japanese Equal Employment Opportunity Act (EEOA). It employs the methodology based in quantile regressions by Melly (2005) to decompose the gender wage gap at several quantiles for cohorts that entered the labor market around the time the EEOA came into effect in 1986. The data used in the main analysis comes from the Employment Status Survey of 1997 and 2002, and the robustness of the results is evaluated employing 2002 and 2007 data. The results show that the gender wage gap shrunk at the lowest income quantiles, mostly due to an improvement in the relative return to characteristics of women. Important changes in the educational level of male workers are observed, which are believed to be a response to the increased competition by better-educated women in managerial positions, and to shifts in the marriage market. An examination by sample segments shows that the largest fluctuations in the wage gap across all quantiles are observed among high school graduates and regular workers. Although the conclusions are robust, the contributions of the different components of the decomposition are affected by the point in time in which cohorts are observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Nelson MARTÍNEZ DAHBURA, 2018. "On the Distributional Effect of Japan’s Equal Employment Opportunity Act on the Gender Wage Gap," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 305-328.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:21:y:2018:i:2:p:305-328.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyy003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:21:y:2018:i:2:p:305-328.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.