IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v18y2015i2p233-240..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guilt, Persecution, and Resurrection in Nagasaki: Atomic Memories and the Urakami Catholic Community

Author

Listed:
  • Gwyn MCCLELLAND

Abstract

Nagasaki was the second city to experience a nuclear attack at the end of World War II, 70 years ago. As we approach this anniversary, two writings suggest the razing of the atomic ruins of Urakami Cathedral in 1959 have constituted a central reason for the relative silence of Nagasaki in comparison to Hiroshima, calling the loss of the ruins a defeat and a reason for an inability of Nagasaki to make history. The memory of the loss of this ‘Bomb Dome’ of Nagasaki diverts attention back to the Catholic community of Urakami, as a people often forgotten in nuclear memory. The Catholic hibakusha (survivors) are largely silent in discussion of the Cathedral ruins, although the social stratification of regions of Nagasaki may be able to make more sense of A-bomb history in this place. Paul Warham’s translation of Seirai Yuichi’s novel presents a fascinating window on the world view of the Catholic community, who were concentrated around Ground Zero in Nagasaki, in the locality of Urakami. Narratives such as that of the Christian minority divulge a lesser known history of Nagasaki. Here, we read of atomic memory touched by the themes of guilt, persecution and also resurrection.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwyn MCCLELLAND, 2015. "Guilt, Persecution, and Resurrection in Nagasaki: Atomic Memories and the Urakami Catholic Community," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 233-240.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:233-240.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyv018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:233-240.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.