IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v18y2015i1p45-61..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional Gender Norms and Women’s Political Participation: How Conservative Women Engage in Political Activism in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Kimiko OSAWA

Abstract

‘Traditional’ gender norms, which prescribe the primary roles of women as mothers and wives in the home, have been identified as one factor that hinders women’s political participation. If so, how do anti-feminist conservative women in Japan, seen as the defenders of ‘traditional’ gender norms, participate in political activism? To answer this question, I examine three issues using statements made by Japanese conservative women themselves: the content of the gender norms they uphold; the constraints they perceive due to their upholding of such gender norms and how they overcome them; and if and how their gender norms can encourage their political activism. My findings demonstrate that conservative women variously manage to make space for their political activism without betraying their commitment to traditional roles at home. Moreover, when intersected by their conservative ideology, their upholding of ‘traditional’ gender norms can prompt them to take political action. Based on these findings, I suggest that paying close attention to women’s agency vis-à-vis gender norms as well as their political ideology can help us attain a better understanding of how exactly ‘traditional’ gender norms influence women’s political participation in a specific context.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimiko OSAWA, 2015. "Traditional Gender Norms and Women’s Political Participation: How Conservative Women Engage in Political Activism in Japan," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 45-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:45-61.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyu041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:45-61.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.