IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v17y2014i1p59-76..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empire and Social Science: Shinmei Masamichi and the East Asian Community in Interwar Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Seok-Won LEE

Abstract

In the early 1930s, a group of Japanese social scientists began producing theories of an East Asian community as a new order for Imperial Japan. Heavily influenced by the political climate of ‘Europe in crisis’ in the aftermath of the Great Depression as well as domestic situations that drove Japan to ultra-nationalism, these Japanese intellectuals grappled with the question of incorporating China and Japan’s colonies into a new multi-ethnic empire. This article pays special attention to Shinmei Masamichi, whose social scientific thinking was first nurtured under the progressive and liberal academic atmosphere of Taisho Japan, but came at the forefront of the rationalization of the Japanese empire in the 1930s and early 1940s. Rejecting both western democracy and the capitalist economy, Shinmei strove to theorize an empire based on anti-racism and multi-ethnicity. In doing so, he provided a strong ideological foundation for Japan’s wartime mobilization efforts in Asia. The intellectual trajectories of Shinmei’s social scientific thinking clearly show how the progressive and liberal social scientific tradition in prewar Japan resulted in an endorsement of imperialism and colonial violence during the wartime period.

Suggested Citation

  • Seok-Won LEE, 2014. "Empire and Social Science: Shinmei Masamichi and the East Asian Community in Interwar Japan," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 59-76.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:59-76.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyt027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:59-76.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.