IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v15y2012i1p93-110..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistent Conservatism in Changing Times: An Analysis of Japanese Conservative Intellectuals’ Thought

Author

Listed:
  • Christian G. WINKLER

Abstract

Conservatism is about defending the status quo; in both Germany and Japan, the status quo is the postwar democratic regime. However, while the representatives of Germany’s intellectual conservatism have come to accept the democratic status quo of the postwar period, the same can hardly be said about intellectual conservatism in Japan, despite the two countries’ similar modern histories. This article seeks to explain this puzzle by pointing to a lack of pressure to adapt and the resulting freedom allowing Japanese conservatives to take a peculiar and consistently negative view of the postwar system’s foundations, which they do not recognize as a new tradition worth building on, but rather a deplorable ideological import forced upon Japan. Based on those observations, the article makes a case for an autonomous intellectual conservatism.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian G. WINKLER, 2012. "Consistent Conservatism in Changing Times: An Analysis of Japanese Conservative Intellectuals’ Thought," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 93-110.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:93-110.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyr032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:15:y:2012:i:1:p:93-110.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.